More Big Thoughts on Schools

Hirsch believes that students should know the fundamental information, which includes memorizing the presidents of the United States. In his opinion, education should be taken most seriously during elementary school, where most fundamental studies happen. Test scores are a more accurate method of assessing a student's knowledge and portfolios are too opinionated. Students need to know their basic information so that they are able to read college-level texts. Knowing how to read and tackle difficult passages are useless; students need to know the actual facts related to the subject.

Sizer, on the other hand, believes that education should be more focused during high school, or before the end of education so that students are prepared to critique if necessary. Succeeding, in Sizer's point of view, is to understand some of the basic knowledge but also to set their own realistic standards that they can achieve. Education should not be shaped by the state and federal administrators but by the students whom the education is being taught to. Test scores does not equate with his definition of serious education. In fact, he proposed to drop the system of test scores, grades, and categories based on age.

I feel that Hirsch and Sizer have a chance to work together. Look at Millennium High School in New York City; they offer AP classes, have their students take regents and write exhibitions on top of that. Hirsch suggest that "tests are far fairer than more subjective means of assessing student performance" while Sizer prefer "explore a single subject for several months and then present an ''exhibition'' of their work to demonstrate what they've learned"(Mosle). Millennium incorporates both ideas together to put loads of pressure on students and who knows, it might be better for their students.

In my experience, I think that SOF used to be one of Sizer's schools. Recently, it has become more of Hirsch's, with the division of math and science classes depending on student's speed. The only classes that remains loyal to Sizer are the social studies and English classes. We the students have a say in what we want to learn in the class and the English class is more open to discussions as oppose to in class essays that are treated as tests. Math and science classes require basic knowledge to understand the more complicated materials that appear in further studies.

Big Expectations for School

Obama's view on school is that schools can provide the opportunity to discover your talents. He delivers a great speech but his solution seems too easy. He says that we can have the best schools in the world; easy to say, but what are the steps he is willing to take to create the best schools in the world. What is the best school in the world, relative to him? Obama wants schools to prepare students for the future, to get good jobs and to get the economy going. Even if some students have the best education out there, there are other factors like racism that stop them from getting the job they want. And if everyone gets what they want, the economy is going to be in high demand for the jobs that people are skeptic about applying for. Obama names the people who were determined to finish high school and go to college. Sure, school can teach you to be persistent but is college necessary to get a good job? What do we learn in college that cannot be learned earlier in our lives?

The article about liberal arts also argue about career but at a personality level. Schools mold our ideas, help us learn to discover ideas, and teach us to think creatively. I don't think art is teaching students a necessary skill in the workplace. What corporations look for are practical solutions to problems and if studying art is enforcing imagination skills, then liberal arts may not be all that important. But other than the workplace, I think studying art is a nice personal hobby. Thomas Friedman implies that schools train us to become tools of corporations across the world like Intel. If corporations cannot get the best engineers in their own country, then they will get them out of other countries such as China. I think school is also encouraging students to compete; it has become sort of a battlefield among students not only in schools themselves but throughout the world. Friedman suggests to step up the education a notch and compete with the education around the world. Even schools within America are competing against each other to see whose students get into the best colleges.

Significance

What are the similarities and differences between schools in America and schools in China? How can schools in America learn from schools in China and what aspects should American schools promote to other schools? What elements affect the schooling system and how schools teach, what schools teach?

I want to compare how American schools and their education compare to other countries, especially China. What are we lacking in our schools and what is strong about our education system? I have heard stories about schools in Japan, how Japanese treat their schools like their second home. They wear no shoes, or shoes other than the ones they wear to go out, in school and clean the school as if it were their house. How does this affect their learning and does it affect their point of view on school so that they feel more motivated in school? Chinese immigrants come to America, risking the fact that their children might be less educated than if they had attended school in China. Is it better to send kids to other countries to better their education or is it worth it to have kids stay in America?

I hope my research will help others in the future make the better choice in their education. They have the choice to accelerate their knowledge and have it for future use or they can take their time to develop social skills. It also seems that some countries encourage competition, to see who is good enough to be hired by large corporations. I think it is also weird to have students compete against each other in communist countries like China, where everyone is on the same level. This competition is also parallel to Darwin's survival of the fittest theory; students are trying to better their education so they will not be the ones working at Duane Reade.